Inspectable Area:
Exterior, Units, and/or Common Areas Inspectable Item: Doors |
Deficiency Notes |
||||||||||||||||||
|
(Everything in this column is unofficial commentary) |
||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||
The door frame here has been
bent by staff members or residents placing rocks or other hard objects
in the hinged part of the door to hold it open, and someone else coming
along and trying to force the door closed. The hinges are out of alignment and the metal frame flexes when the door is opened and closed. The door has a hydraulic closer that cannot work properly against the flexing of the frame, so the door won't close and latch. When the closer does not work, we would normally call this a hardware issue. However, in this case, properly assessed, it is actually a problem of Exteriors; Doors; Damaged Frame; Level 3 |
|||||||||||||||||||
Here, we can see daylight
around the door. We would expect this normally to be a Unit; Doors; Deteriorated Caulking/Seals issue - but when we examine the weather stripping, it is not damaged. We call it: Unit; Doors; Damaged Frame; Level 3 |
|||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||
The closer on this Common Area
Restroom door obviously doesn't work properly. Common Areas; Restroom; (sub item) Doors; Damaged Hardware; Level 3 Might there be another defect associated with this condition? (Hint: It would depend on the size of the screw holes where the closer used to be attached.) |
|||||||||||||||||||
The latching mechanism is
completely gone, and the holes in the door have been partially patched
over. It looks a lot like another hardware issue, but is it? Let's think about this one, while we look at the next door defect type. (Hint: It also looks like the edge of the door could use a coat of paint.) |
|||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||
Similar to the photo of the
closer problem above, there are some holes in this door. This
time, we know that these happen to be just over 1/4 inch. That's the only problem - the new closer works okay - the problem is the holes left by the old closer. Common Areas; Office; (sub item) Doors; Damaged Surface; Level 3 By the way... we noticed that this is a fire rated door. The term "fire door" is taken to mean several things: 1 - a fire exit 2 - a fire control door 3 - a fire rated door Trust me on this: if it's a fire rated door, the Level is always 3. |
|||||||||||||||||||
Entry to an isolated mechanical
area only accessible from the outside. This is one of those areas where "nobody ever goes," or so the maintenance man was thinking when he prepared the property for the inspection. Nobody ever goes there - except the REAC INSPECTOR - might have been a better way to think of it. Yes, this area got inspected, and yes, the inspector called this Damaged Surface, Level 3. Since this was a single building property, they lost right around 6 points on this rust ! ! ! |
|||||||||||||||||||
Entry door... Worn away to bare wood... that's what we might call a "hole." Not a very deep hole, but it is a hole none-the-less. Over a quarter inch. This is another Level 3 Surface issue. Another thing to look out for: doors that have been sanded or planed down along one edge to make them close easier. Sometimes, when the door frame has settled a bit, the door hits the frame and becomes difficult to open and close because it is rubbing or striking the frame. If the door is sanded or planed down, leaving bare wood on the edge, many inspector will cite this as Surface Damage, Level 3. |
|||||||||||||||||||
This split in a bedroom door
goes under Units; Doors; Damaged Surface,
but what's the level? It's a crack about 1/4 wide... ...but it's also several inches long. That makes it a hole larger than 1/2 inch. Don't let the word "diameter" fool you. A hole does not necessarily have to be round. Trust us on this one, too. Split doors are going to be cited as Level 3 Surface Damage. |
|||||||||||||||||||
Speaking of the edges of
doors... wow... the hits keep coming. And, whatever hit this door, hit it hard enough to break the safety glass. We might even have two defects here. It also looks like the door is so warped that it doesn't close and latch properly. Maybe it would be more fair to say that the lack of function is due to the surface damage - the door being bent - but do assume that your REAC inspector would probably cite both Surface and Hardware Damage on this one. |
|||||||||||||||||||
Wikipedia: A primer (/ˈpraɪmər/) or undercoat is a preparatory coating put on materials before painting. Priming ensures better adhesion of paint to the surface, increases paint durability, and provides additional protection for the material being painted. reacguru: Primer is not paint, that's why they call it "primer" instead of calling it "paint." For purposes of the REAC inspection, we expect EVERY door (without exception) to have a "protective finish," whether this is paint or varnish. If the door does not have a finish coat, it is considered Level 3 Surface Damage. |
|||||||||||||||||||
|
Screen/storm doors are
ALWAYS associated with a Unit
or Common
Area, NOT with the
Bldg Exterior Prove it: Here |
||||||||||||||||||
With one exception - Screen
door damage can ONLY be Level 1. Dented = Level 1 Torn Screen = Level 1 Busted in half = Level 1 * Completely missing = Level 1 The exception: If a "security door" is missing or does not function properly, it is Level 3. So WHAT, you might ask, is a "security door?" * of course if the broken door creates a sharp edge hazard, that becomes a separate Health and Safety defect. |
|||||||||||||||||||
A security door is a screen or
storm door with a KEYED lock to provide additional security. There is no Door deficiency in this photo as far as we can recall, but it IS an example of one type of security door. Unfortunately, it is also an example of an Emergency Exit Blocked/Unusable because the resident has installed a double cylinder lock. (Requires a key to get out) |
|||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||
The weather stripping between
these two doors is a sort of "brush" that runs along the edge of
one door. This has been torn off of the door for the last 5 or 6 inches at the bottom - you can see through at the bottom of the door. This is called Bldg Exterior; Doors; Deteriorated Caulking/Seals; Level 3 Believe it or not, the property loses MORE POINTS on a weather stripping issue than if the door did NOT LOCK. Single Building Example: Hardware L3 = 7.2 points Seal L3 = 9.7 points |
|||||||||||||||||||
Remember the example we started
off with - the second example anyway - under Damaged Frames? What if we saw daylight, but when we examined the weather stripping, we found it was badly damaged? We wouldn't call it Damaged Frame, we'd call it Deteriorated Seals - but it would still be Level 3. |
|||||||||||||||||||
By the way - remember that the
sweep is part of the door seals. If the sweep is damaged or missing, it is the same defect. Doors; Deteriorated Caulking/Seals; Level 3 |
|||||||||||||||||||
|
We are finding it ever more
common in Public Housing that many Public Housing Agencies are simply
getting rid of closet doors. This is one of the unintended consequences of the REAC inspection, good or bad. After talking to MANY residents, we have generally found that many of them prefer to hang a shower curtain over the closet than to have constantly troublesome bi-fold doors. |
||||||||||||||||||
If you take down a door, you
must take down all evidence the door was there - the tracks, hardware,
etc. - then fill the holes, sand the fill, and paint it to look like
there never was a door. If bi-fold closet doors are off the track, some inspectors will call this a Door Hardware issue, while others will call it a Missing Door. Technically, if the closet only has one door which is missing, it would be Level 3 because this would be 100% of the doors for that area. However, we most often see inspectors calling it Level 1 because they are convinced that all closet door issues are Level 1. In reality, only the Hardware definition mentions closet doors. |
|||||||||||||||||||
and the shower curtain always look this good, right? ... except they would have Sponge Bob or Dora on them. |
Interesting Trivia: The Inventor of Bi-Fold Doors was Bill Z. Bubb |
||||||||||||||||||
Compilation Bulletin 4.0 v. 2 | |||||||||||||||||||
A. Doors (Applies to all
inspectable areas) 1. Sample buildings may be generated that contain no sample units. Therefore, any door deficiencies may have to be recorded in different inspectable areas depending on whether or not the sample building has sample units to be inspected. Record as follows: a. If a sample building has sample units, record all deficiencies observed on the unit entry doors in the associated units. Do not record deficiencies for unit entry doors on units not in the sample. b. If a sample building has no sample units to inspect, record all deficiencies observed on any unit entry doors on the building exterior in [Building Exterior], [Doors]…, and all deficiencies observed on any unit entry doors in a common area hall or corridor in [Common Areas], [Halls/Corridors/Stairs], [Doors]... In these cases, disregard the Note in the [Building Exterior], [Doors]… deficiency that says, “This does not include unit doors.” c. If common area doors exist, whether exterior or interior, any observed defects are to be recorded in the associated common area into which the door swings. The only exceptions are for doors that swing outward leading to the building exterior. In this case record any deficiencies identified in [Building Exterior], [Doors]… 2. There are two types of entry doors: (1) a building entry door that leads from the exterior of a building into the building interior, and (2) a unit entry door that leads from the exterior of a building or from a building common area into a unit. If an inspector observes a deficiency on the entry door of a single family building, the deficiency must be recorded under [Unit], [Doors]. [Building Exterior], [Doors] would be marked as “NA”. 3. A lock is not required on any door. If a lock was installed it must be inspected to ensure that it functions as designed with the exception that common area interior doors (not unit entry) may have missing locks. Inspectors must distinguish between locks that are intended to prevent others from entering a room and hardware that allows a door to latch (e.g. knob set or passageway set). Door hardware that is designed to latch and hold the door in place is not a lock and must function as designed. 4. The deficiency Deteriorated/Missing Caulking Seals applies only to entry doors. Entry doors not designed with seals are not required by the UPCS protocol to have seals. When recording seal defects, inspectors must use their own professional experience to observe and determine whether or not a factory applied or professionally installed seal is or was present. Inspectors are not to record a deficiency for missing or deteriorated after-market seals applied by the residents. a. When the inspector observes light around a closed entry door with a seal that exhibits no evidence of seal damage, it is a deficiency that is to be recorded as [Light can be observed around the edges and you observe no seal deterioration] in the appropriate inspectable area. b. Insulated glass and thermal pane doors that show evidence of seal leakage, such as condensation or discoloration between glass panes, must be recorded as [Seals/caulking is missing or deteriorated to the point the door is not weather-resistant (if designed to have seals)] in the appropriate inspectable area. 5. Screen, storm, and security doors are defined as follows and will be inspected as part of the associated Common Area or Unit: a. A screen door has a screen with or without a locking device. b. A storm door may have a glass panel but is designed to provide protection to the entry door. c. A security door is designed to provide added security through strength and has additional locks and/or other locking mechanisms. 6. Holes left in doors from the removal of hardware must be evaluated as door surface damage. 7. A door missing from its jamb or frame is recorded as [Door is missing] regardless of whether or not the door is in the immediate area. 8. Double doors that serve one door entrance are considered to be one door. Record as one missing door if one or both are missing. 9. Doors in units that have been removed by the property, other than in elderly or handicapped units, must have all evidence of their previous existence removed. The holes where the hinges were located as well as the mortised area of the hinges and the strike must be filled, sanded, and painted; otherwise it is recorded as a Missing Door deficiency. 10. If a majority of doors within a unit are painted or varnished, then any unpainted or unvarnished door must be recorded as a [Exterior, Common Area or Unit], [Doors], [appropriate floor level or room location], [type of door], [Surface is damaged], [Door has significant peeling, cracked, or no paint] deficiency. If a majority of the doors are unpainted or unvarnished, do not record a deficiency. 11. A stick is an acceptable alternative to an inoperable lock only for a sliding glass door. If the stick is not installed it must be in the vicinity of the door and must be installed/tested by the inspector to ensure that the door can be secured. 12. Group Homes are special use facilities, not unlike nursing homes, and the rule applicable to 504 units must be applied. If management chooses not to allow the clients to have locks on the doors, then the UPCS inspection protocol does not require them. |
Here's the section of Compilation Bulletin 4.0 version 2 that applies to doors... | ||||||||||||||||||
p 36 Egress note: 5. Evaluating unit closets for blocked egress: a. A closet door is considered primary egress from the closet area. Any lock, chain, damaged hardware or other device that prevents egress from a floor area, which includes all doors on all floors, is considered a blocked egress. Any blockage that limits a person’s ability to exit a room in the event of an emergency is considered a deficiency. Professional common sense and inspector knowledge are to be applied. b. A padlock or any other locking mechanism used by the property to secure the unit mechanical closet will not be recorded as a blocked egress. Additionally, similar locking mechanisms, whether installed by the resident or property, to secure the unit exterior storage closet or shed will not be recorded as a blocked egress. B. Common Area Doors – Blocked Fire Exits with Double Keyed Deadbolts 1. Double-sided keyed deadbolt locks in Common Areas are an EH&S deficiency when they serve as the entrance or exit points for residential units into hallways, lobbies, stairways, and similar areas. This does not apply to common areas in residential buildings that are not the intended egress for residential units such as laundry rooms, shops, and offices. C. Unit Doors – Blocked Fire Exits with Double Keyed Deadbolts 1. Double-sided keyed knob locks and deadbolts, when observed on doors that serve as one of the two required means of egress from a unit floor area, are a Health & Safety, Emergency/Fire Exits, Blocked/Unusable deficiency. This applies to all doors on all floors that serve as a main or primary means of exit. A primary exit door is the main means of egress from a floor area such as a bedroom, kitchen, or living room. |
|||||||||||||||||||
UPCS GUIDANCE & PROTOCOL CLARIFICATIONS Effective date: May 23, 2016 |
|||||||||||||||||||
Self-Latching
Doors: • Is it acceptable for inspectors to allow the property representative to remove door sweeps and items hanging from hooks on self-closing doors during the inspection? If a resident has added a door sweep or wreath hanger, our protocol allows the resident or POA to remove the item to demonstrate that the door closer works properly. • How many times should an inspector attempt to open/close a “self-closing” door? Two attempts shall be made varying the angle of the opened door (e.g. 45 degrees, 90, degrees, etc.). If after two attempts the door does not latch it is a defect. • Can the resident or POA assist the “self-closing” doors function by raising/closing windows using airflow to assist? No. Do not allow a resident or a POA to open a window to get a door to shut. The door should work when the windows are opened or closed. • During the inspection, can the POA or the inspector repair the door hardware on a bi-fold door (e.g. replace the pin in the top track)? No. It is a defect. • You observe a missing strike plate on the door frame but the door latches and stay’s secure. It is a defect? Yes, it is a defect for door hardware and the level is based on the type of door. |
|||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||
Cracked glass that has not
separated and has not created a Sharp Edges Hazard is called Windows; Cracked/Broken/Missing Panes; Level 3 Like all of the Door defects above*, Window defects can be cited for Exteriors, Common Areas, and/or Units. Unlike Door defects, Window defects should be cited as part of the Exterior ONLY when the inspector is not entering the building, but only inspecting the Exterior. Window issues cited on the Exterior are non-scoring ! ! * exception: screen door issues |
|||||||||||||||||||
|
That's a pretty easy definition: if one or more screens has any damage at all, it is Level 1 defect. It can't go any higher than Level 1. | ||||||||||||||||||
He's thinking, "I can't believe I spent all that time, energy, and money on window screens and never realized they were only worth three one hundredths of a point per Unit! I should have read the scoring guide built into the simplified definitions!" |
NO:
Removing all the screens from every Unit does
NOT prevent the inspector from citing window
screen issues. DON'T DO IT. It will mean that every single Unit inspected gets cited for screens. This is one of the most frequent questions people ask us in live seminars. The really sad part of this is that none of these people are first considering how many points window screens are worth. In the rare case where every single Unit got cited for window screens, the property would lose about 0.03 points - three one hundredths - per Unit. The TOTAL loss across all Units inspected would be about 0.75 - three fourths of one point. Understand the scoring value of the defects before you get wrapped up in a silly scheme to try to avoid citation of an extremely low scoring defect like screens. |
||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||
These are older single pane windows in an area of
the nation with a cold climate. The glass sweats when it gets cold
and water runs down onto the wooden frame and sill. As a result, this window frame is rather rotten. Unless this is compromising the weather tightness of the window, this would only be Level 1. |
|||||||||||||||||||
|
Not functioning: Won't open Won't close Won't lock Won't stay up - balance is not working |
||||||||||||||||||
The latch does not engage the slot in the frame here,
so the window cannot be locked. The original UPCS definition shown above is one of the most confusingly worded definitions in the entire protocol. Boil it down like this: Any window that does not lock is Level 3. Any window that fails to function in some other way is Level 1 - UNLESS it is the only window in the room. If it is the only window, it is Level 3. If the only window in an area will not open or will not stay open, we probably have an Emergency Exit issue as well. |
|||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||
When an insulated window panel is fogged, this is due
to condensation between the panes. This is caused by a leak in the seal of the insulated glass pane unit, which allows moisture to infiltrate and also allows any special conditioned gases that may have been used between the glass to escape. Wikipedia on "insulated glazing" The leak makes the defect Level 3 The big surprise? Look up the scoring value. You lose twice as many points for a fogged window than for one with no glass at all! |
|||||||||||||||||||
|
A window or windows needing paint in the typical Unit is worth about one one hundredth of one point = 0.01 | ||||||||||||||||||
Paint issues on a window are always Level 1, no
matter how severe. This defect is worth about 1/100th of a point in the typical Unit, about 2/10th of a point in the typical Common Area, and NO points on the Exterior. Any questions? If you have questions on this issue, you should re-read the point values over and over until you get the message here: You will never, never, ever lose more than about half a point on window paint, even if it affects every window on the property. This is not an important REAC issue. It may be an important maintenance issue, but it is not an important REAC issue. |
|||||||||||||||||||
|
This is the only type of
Blocked Emergency Exit that has its own special defect name. When citing a Windows Security Bars issue, it is NOT necessary to also cite Emergency Exits Blocked/Unusable. This IS considered Life Threatening. |
||||||||||||||||||
These fixed bars cannot be opened at all, they would
have to be removed in order to exit this window. However, IF your property HAS fixed security bars in some areas, it is possible that this is okay by local code. Don't start removing bars without consulting your internal code expert to see if it is technically okay to have bars. If it IS okay to have bars, then you should look into filing an appeal rather than removing them. You could even appeal this in advance, using a "Pre Data Base Adjustment." Contact us about this. |
|||||||||||||||||||
These window bars have a keyed lock, as evidenced by
the keys handing out of the lock in the lower corner of the open window. Even if the keys are present, right in the lock already, this is still a Security Bars issue. Opening the bars "cannot require the use of a tool." |
|||||||||||||||||||
Compilation Bulletin 4.0 v. 2 p. 20 | |||||||||||||||||||
A. Windows (Applies to all
inspectable areas.) 1. Sample buildings may be generated that contain no sample units. Therefore, window deficiencies may have to be recorded in different inspectable areas depending on whether or not the sample building has sample units to be inspected. They are to be recorded as follows: a. If a sample building has sample units and common areas, record window deficiencies in the units and common areas in which they are observed. Health and Safety window deficiencies that are observed on non-sample units should be recorded under [Exterior or Common Area], [appropriate floor level (if applicable)], [Health and Safety], [Hazards], [Any Other - This does pose a risk of bodily injury]. b. If a sample building has no sample units to inspect, all unit windows must be visually inspected and deficiencies observed recorded in [Building Exterior], [Windows]…. Inspectors must record all window deficiencies observed in common areas in the associated Common Area. 2. Insulated glass and thermal pane windows that show evidence of seal leakage such as condensation or discoloration between glass panes must be recorded as [Caulk, Seals, or Glazing Compound (includes Thermopane or insulated windows)], [Deteriorated or Missing], [There is condensation or discoloration between the glass panes of a Thermopane] in the appropriate inspectable area. 3. When fixed security bars are present that cover a window that is the only secondary means of emergency egress from a floor area (e.g. room, unit, building) on the third or lower floor, or on any floor that the window is the designed egress point to a designated fire escape, the deficiency [Windows], [appropriate floor level or room location], [Security Bars], [Window is designed for egress, but exiting is severely limited or impossible], [Security bars are damaged or improperly constructed/installed] must be recorded in the appropriate inspectable area. However, a deficiency must not be recorded for windows that are not large enough or not otherwise designed for egress. 4. A hasp attached to moveable security bars is not a deficiency provided that the inspector can test the bars to evaluate proper operation. However, a lock on moveable security bars, requiring a key (special tool) to open, whether locked or unlocked at the time of inspection, must be recorded as a [Windows], [appropriate floor level or room location], [Security Bars], [Windows is designed for egress, but exiting is severely limited or impossible], [Security bars that are designed to open cannot be readily opened or require a key or other special tool] deficiency in the appropriate Inspectable area, when the window is the only secondary means of emergency egress from a floor area on the third or lower floor. 5. Child safety window guards that are normally found in apartment and public hallway windows to protect children 10 years of age or younger from falling to the outside of the building, are typically lightweight metal construction and can be dislodged with a reasonable degree of force when necessary and should not be considered as blocked egress unless they are improperly installed or constructed. B. Windows: Common Areas and Units 1. All windows in sample units and common areas must be inspected (tested) for correct operation. 2. A stick is an acceptable alternative to an inoperable lock for a window if it is observed in place or in the vicinity of the window. The inspector must test the window with the stick installed to ensure that the window can be secured. 3. On the third floor and below: Windows that cannot be opened and provide the only secondary means of egress from a floor area (e.g. room, unit, or building) must be recorded as a [Windows], [appropriate floor level or room location], [Lock/Operability, Window cannot be opened…] deficiency, with a [Health and Safety], [appropriate floor level or room location], [Emergency/Fire Exits], [Blocked]… deficiency. 4. On the fourth floor and above: Windows that are damaged and cannot be opened on the fourth floor and above when there are no other operable windows in the same floor area must be recorded as a [Windows], [appropriate floor level or room location], [Lock/Operability], [Window cannot be opened…]. Only record a [Health and Safety], [appropriate floor level or room location], [Emergency/Fire Exits], [Blocked]… deficiency if it also provides access to a fixed fire escape route (landing, ladder, roof, etc.). |
|||||||||||||||||||